Archive | June, 2012
Aside

Bibi and the settlements: then and now

6 Jun

Today, the Knesset voted down a bill legalizing construction in the settlement of Givat Ulpana in the West Bank. Bibi himself threatened to fire any minister who voted for it. But getting rid of settlements is never easy, as Bibi’s great compromise is here to show us — through the construction of 551 new units. In addition to the 300 housing units slated for Bet El, “117 will be built in Ariel; 92 in Ma’ale Adumim; 144 in Adam; and 84 in Kiryat Arba.”

Reminds me of a little something in 1997 that went like this, as excerpted from my undergraduate thesis:

Netanyahu’s tendency to give in to his government systematically eroded the Hebron Agreement. Following the signing, for example, Netanyahu knew he needed to “compensate his constituency” if he was to carry out a credible first FRD. There were plans to build in Har Homa, an area “between Bethlehem and the Arab neighborhoods in Jerusalem,” but the right and center members of the Prime Minister’s cabinet were “demanding that he build in Jerusalem now.”  Member of Knesset (MK) Hanan Porat of the National Religious Party commented that “’Jerusalem can’t be allowed to become the hostage of the Hebron agreements,’” and Jerusalem Mayor and Likud MK Ehud Olmert “said that from the planning viewpoint there is no reason to hold up the Har Homa project.” When a “mentally deranged Jordanian soldier shot and killed seven Israeli teenage girls” on March 13, Netanyahu used the tragedy as an excuse to begin the building process.  Ross cautioned the Prime Minister that government’s actions looked like a deliberate attempt to “cut Arabs off from Jerusalem,”  but preparations for construction continued even though the Hebron Agreement prohibited both sides from creating new facts on the ground.  This was part of the “consistent pattern” in which, “having moved toward an understanding, Netanyahu then drew back … to placate his right-wing base.”

(footnotes/citations here)

Chen Guangcheng speaks at the CFR

1 Jun

Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng remains very concerned about the state of law in China, he told Council on Foreign Relations fellow Jerome Cohen during a discussion at the CFR’s New York office Thursday, where he spoke publicly for the first time since he arrived in the U.S. on May 19.

“It’s still very much being trampled on,” he said. “Our central government more than once has stated that I’m a free person, I’m a legal person, and it was very normal for me to leave Shandong. After I left Shandong, the local authorities, the deputy secretary in charge of law and order, got 30-odd hired thugs with axe handles and busted their way into the home of my elder brother and his son.”

Though Guangcheng’s brother has returned to Shandong, he is still “under tremendous pressure,” and Guangcheng’s nephew has been accused of murder.

“My nephew is still in a detention center,” he explained. “His lawyer cannot meet with him and we can’t get any information on him, and as I understand, keeping him isolated from his lawyer probably suggests that he may be tortured and they’re just trying to hide that fact.”

China’s moral standards in this case, he added, are at “rock bottom.”

Guangcheng also spoke to the disconnect between China’s central and local governments.

“I think of course they [the central government] know what’s going on at the local level, but I’m also sure they don’t know what’s completely going on because under the present circumstances they just hear a lot of reports, but they don’t have that many channels for directly communicating with the people,” he said.

Even so, corruption reaches down to all levels.

“The Bo Xilai incident reminds of another incident,” Guangcheng noted. “We had somebody at the level of a vice governor in Shandong province who, out of his own interest, in order to keep a cover-up on a mistress he had for 13 years, used a remote controlled bomb to blow her to pieces. Bo Xilai is not an isolated case.”

Regarding his stay at the U.S. embassy in Beijing and the diplomatic firestorm that ensued, he said he never changed his mind when he decided to pursue studying abroad in the U.S. after initially telling American officials that he wanted to stay in China.

“After the diplomatic agreement was reached between China and the U.S. and the central government guaranteed my personal safety, in other words after I left the U.S. embassy, I enjoyed those rights,” Guangcheng explained. “One of those rights is the freedom to travel in and out of China.”

The world should celebrate that, he added.

“I think we can see that the central government is letting me come to the U.S. to study,” Guangcheng said. “That is unprecedented. Regardless of what they did in the past, as long as they’re beginning to move in the right direction we should affirm it. We shouldn’t be just in this habit of challenging what they’re doing.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 707 other followers